Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4561909 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 14 Aug 2023 · Published 14 Aug 2023 · Application 4561909

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

R Lee

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4561909 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 14 Aug 2023 · Published 14 Aug 2023 · Application 4561909

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

R Lee

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

Suppression of the parties’ names and identifying details are granted.
The tenant’s application is dismissed.

Reasons

The applicant did not attend the phone hearing at the scheduled time. I called his contact mobile phone number 3 times and left voice messages twice.
The applicant did not request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).
The other party was called and answered. He says he is not the landlord and gave a phone number for [The landlord/s] who he says is the landlord.
I spoke to [The landlord’s agent]. His wife is [The landlord’s agent’s wife]. He says they are flatmates.
Because the names of the parties may be incorrect I have granted a suppression order. The impact on potentially incorrectly named parties outweighs the public interest. See section 95A RTA.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s1, s78(1), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4561909 about?

The tribunal order states: Suppression of the parties’ names and identifying details are granted.

How much money was awarded in case 4561909?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4561909?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4561909?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9101982-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.