How much money was awarded in case 4631709?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4631709?

The primary dispute was 14-day notice.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4631709?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9298222-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 4631709?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4631709?

The primary dispute was 14-day notice.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4631709?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9298222-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

56 Selwyn Street, Waimataitai, Timaru 7910 Tenancy Tribunal Case 4631709 — 14-day notice

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4631709 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord name and identifying details.

The tenancy of Thunda Mere Ross at 56 Selwyn Street, Waimataitai, Timaru 7910 is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 23:59 hours Sunday 15 October 2023, if not before by the tenant giving the landlord no less than two working days written notice to terminate.

Thunda Mere Ross must pay [The landlord/s] $20.44 immediately, being the filing application fee.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.

The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to remedy damage to the property and other issues.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 30 June 2023 and a further notice on 26 June 2023 and the tenant did not remedy the breaches within the required period.

It was apparent both parties desire this tenancy to end. I am satisfied the landlord has established grounds for termination but by mutual agreement of the parties the end date of this tenancy is extended to 15 October 2023 to assist the tenant with planning her exit. The landlord also agreed to the short notice to terminate provision for the tenant in this order, equally to assist her if advantageous.

The tenant is reminded the tenancy continues with the respective obligations and there is nothing to prevent a further landlord application for termination before the tenancy ends on 15 October 2023 if circumstances require. Application filing fee

Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression

Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.

The landlord requested suppression of its name and as it has been wholly successful in these proceedings suppression is ordered.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord name and identifying details.

Thunda Mere Ross must pay [The landlord/s] $20.44 immediately, being the filing application fee.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to remedy damage to the property and other issues.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 30 June 2023 and a further notice on 26 June 2023 and the tenant did not remedy the breaches within the required period.

Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression

The landlord requested suppression of its name and as it has been wholly successful in these proceedings suppression is ordered.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4631709 — 14-day notice at 56 Selwyn Street, Waimataitai, Timaru 7910

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4631709 — 14-day notice at 56 Selwyn Street, Waimataitai, Timaru 7910

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions