Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4647029 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 19 Jul 2024 · Published 19 Jul 2024 · Application 4647029

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4647029 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 19 Jul 2024 · Published 19 Jul 2024 · Application 4647029

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

By consent, the application for rehearing is dismissed.

Reasons

[The landlord’s representative] attended the hearing on behalf of the landlord
Ms Earlly-Payne, the tenant, attended the hearing.
Mr Moses, the other tenant, did not attend the hearing or the substantive hearing in February 2024.
On 13 February 2024, the Tribunal made an order in favour of the landlord.
On 19 April 2024, Ms Earlly-Payne applied for a rehearing on the grounds that she did not receive notices of the hearing date.
[The landlord’s representative] and Ms Earlly-Payne made their oral submissions.
After I heard the submissions, Ms Earlly-Payne took a 10-minute break to consider her options.
After the hearing reconvened, Ms Earlly-Payne indicated that she no longer wanted to pursue her rehearing application.
Accordingly, Ms Earlly-Payne’s rehearing application is dismissed.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4647029 about?

The tribunal order states: By consent, the application for rehearing is dismissed.

How much money was awarded in case 4647029?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4647029?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4647029?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10483809-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.