How much money was awarded in case 4652310?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4652310?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4652310?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9413954-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 4652310?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4652310?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4652310?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9413954-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4652310 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4652310 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord name and identifying details.

The tenancy of at is terminated, and possession is granted to , at 12.00 noon on Wednesday 27 September 2023.

must pay immediately, being the filing fee for this application.

Reasons

The application sought termination of the tenancy.

The hearing took place in [Event location suppressed] on 13 September 2023.

[The landlord’s representative] represented [The landlord/s] at the hearing. There was no appearance by the tenant.

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy if 1 : a. The tenant has breached a term of the tenancy agreement or of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986; and 1 Section 56, Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA) b. If the breach is capable of being remedied, the landlord has given the tenant a notice identifying the breach and giving the tenant a reasonable period of time (not less than 14-days) to remedy the breach; and c. The tenant did not remedy the breach before the end of the notice period; and d. The nature and extent of the breach is such that it would be unjust to refuse the request for termination.

[The landlord’s representative] provided copies of inspection reports from inspections that [The landlord/s] carried out in April, May, June, July, August, and September.

This evidence shows that Mr Te Moni breached his obligations by: a. Failing to keep the premises in a reasonably clean and tidy condition; and b. Causing damage beyond fair wear and tear; and c. Keeping pets at the property.

[The landlord’s representative] submitted that Mr Te Moni has six dogs at the property. The tenancy agreement states that the tenant is not allowed pets.

The dogs are the obvious cause of much of the damage and mess at the property.

[The landlord/s] issued breach notices to Mr Te Moni on 19 April, 23 May, and 20 July 2023.

The notices identify the breaches in respect of pets, and failing to keep the premises in a reasonably clean and tidy condition.

Mr Te Moni did not remedy the breaches within the period of the notices.

It would be unjust to refuse the request for termination in this instance having regard to: a. The continuing deterioration of the property. b. Mr Te Moni’s failure to remove the dogs, or even to reduce their number. c. The extent and degree of rubbish and mess.

The tenancy is terminated at 12.00 noon on 27 September 2023.

The landlord has been successful in this application, and I must award the landlord the filing fee of $20.44 2 .

Name suppression was sought and is granted to the landlord 3 . 2 Section 102(4)(a) RTA 3 Section 95A(1) RTA