Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4780099 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 2 Feb 2024 · Published 2 Feb 2024 · Application 4780099

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

J Greene

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4780099 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 2 Feb 2024 · Published 2 Feb 2024 · Application 4780099

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

J Greene

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The tenancy of Kenneth Mortimer at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 pm on Monday 5 February 2024.

Reasons

The landlord’s representative attended the hearing. The tenant did not attend. I conducted the hearing by phone. My 2 calls to the tenant were not answered.
The landlord served a 90-day notice to terminate the tenancy under section 51(2)(f) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA) on 22 September 2023.
The tenant has remained in possession and has not complied with the termination notice.
The landlord wants to commence extensive refurbishment of the premises and it would not be reasonably practicable for the tenant to remain in occupation while the work is done.
The landlord’s representative gave evidence that the work will commence as soon as the landlord has possession of the premises.
It is likely that the premises will then be placed on the market for sale.
I have delayed possession for one week so the tenant can make arrangements to move.
The landlord sought, and is entitled to, a name suppression order as the application is successful – section 95A RTA.
The landlord did not seek the Tribunal filing fee.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s51(2), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4780099 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Kenneth Mortimer at [Tenancy address suppressed] is

How much money was awarded in case 4780099?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4780099?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4780099?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9891394-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.