Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4844329 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 14 May 2024 · Published 14 May 2024 · Application 4844329

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

R Morgan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4844329 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 14 May 2024 · Published 14 May 2024 · Application 4844329

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

R Morgan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

Ihome Property Management Limited must pay [The tenant/s] $20.44 immediately, being the filing fee on this application.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,760.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to [The tenant/s] immediately.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing by telephone.
The tenant has applied for refund of the bond. The landlord says that it has a claim against the bond but has not filed a counterclaim with Tenancy Services.
Section 22B(2) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that, where a tenant applies for refund of the bond, and the landlord seeks payment from the bond, the landlord must file an application setting out the details of the counterclaim.
Because the landlord has not filed a counterclaim the bond is refunded in full to the tenant.
As the tenant was the successful party, I have awarded reimbursement of the Tribunal application fee and granted the tenant’s request for suppression of its details.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s22B(2)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4844329 about?

The tribunal order states: Ihome Property Management Limited must pay [The tenant/s] $20.44

How much money was awarded in case 4844329?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4844329?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4844329?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10332917-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.