Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4845782 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 27 Jun 2024 · Published 27 Jun 2024 · Application 4845782

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kemp

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4845782 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 27 Jun 2024 · Published 27 Jun 2024 · Application 4845782

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kemp

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant and landlord’s names and identifying details.
The tenant’s remaining claims (section 38 and section 45(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986) are withdrawn.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.
My earlier order dated 11 May 2024 set out the tenant’s claims and made a number of orders by consent.
The tenant’s remaining claims are in relation to s 38 and s 45(1)(e) RTA. I finished hearing those claims today (the claim being for slamming doors, washing lines, behaviour of other tenants, parking, music and having to manage contractors).
At the end of the hearing the parties were able to agree a way forward and the tenant agreed that I was not required to make a further order in relation to her remaining claims and that she would withdraw them.
I commend all parties in taking a sensible and forward-thinking approach in this case. The issues heard by the Tribunal had clearly been concerning for the tenant. The property managers were able to reflect on this and offer some assurances to the tenant and discuss matters with her. This meant that the tenant decided no further order was required.
I award both parties name suppression which they requested. The parties could have resolved their disputes in a confidential mediation process. It is in the public interest that parties can resolve their disputes without recourse to the Tribunal (Section 95A, RTA).

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s38, s45(1), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4845782 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 4845782?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4845782?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4845782?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10482103-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.