What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4852684 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant’s name and identifying details.

How much money was awarded in case 4852684?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4852684?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4852684?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10442290-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4852684 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant’s name and identifying details.

How much money was awarded in case 4852684?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4852684?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4852684?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10442290-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4852684 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

The Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant’s name and identifying details.
The application is dismissed.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.
The landlord has applied to the Tribunal for an order terminating the periodic tenancy on the grounds of anti-social behaviour from the tenant or someone on the premises with the tenant’s permission.
Subject to certain considerations, the Tribunal must make an order terminating the tenancy if it is satisfied: a. on 3 separate occasions within a 90-day period the tenant, or a person in the premises with the tenant’s permission, engaged in anti-social behaviour in connection with the tenancy; and b. on each occasion the landlord gave the tenant written notice— i. describing clearly which specific behaviour was considered anti- social and (if known to the landlord) who engaged in it; and ii. advising the tenant of the date, approximate time, and location of the behaviour; and iii. stating how many other notices (if any) the landlord has given the tenant under this paragraph in connection with the same tenancy and the same 90-day period; and iv. advising the tenant of the tenant’s right to make an application to the Tribunal challenging the notice and; c. the landlord’s application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days after the landlord gave the third notice.
The tenant disputes that two of the three incidents amount to anti-social behaviour that he is responsible for. However, it is not necessary to consider the claims in any detail because the landlord failed to give the tenant written notices in accordance with the above requirements in respect of two of the allegations. Therefore, the landlord cannot bring an application for termination on the grounds of antisocial behaviour and the claim must be dismissed.
As the application has been dismissed, it is appropriate to suppress the name and identifying details of the tenant.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4852684 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 4852684 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Frequently asked questions