Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4857223 — Tenancy dispute at suppressed]

Decided 21 May 2024 · Published 21 May 2024 · Application 4857223

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

N Maplesden

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4857223 — Tenancy dispute at suppressed]

Decided 21 May 2024 · Published 21 May 2024 · Application 4857223

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

N Maplesden

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

[The landlord/s] are granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] immediately.

Reasons

The applicant (RNW) attended the hearing today. The respondent did not attend. I continued in his absence as he has been posted notice of the hearing. The Tribunal telephoned the respondent’s phone number during the hearing however the phone went directly to voicemail.
The applicants have applied for possession of the premises.
These premises were owned by the applicants’ mother (DH) until her death in January 2024.
The applicant says that the respondent and other occupant/s are living in the premises.
The applicants were appointed executors of the estate of DH by probate granted on 28 February 2024.
The applicants have given the respondent written notice that he and all other occupants are required to vacate the premises.
The respondent has refused to vacate and remains living at the premises.
I am satisfied that the applicants are entitled to possession of these residential premises.
There is no evidence that the respondent or any other occupants have any lawful right of occupation of the premises.
I make a possession order, effective immediately, pursuant to section 65 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
I have suppressed all names and the address from the published order as the interests of the family outweigh the public interest.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s65

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4857223 about?

The tribunal order states: [The landlord/s] are granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address

How much money was awarded in case 4857223?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4857223?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4857223?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10354181-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.