Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4871460 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 31 May 2024 · Published 31 May 2024 · Application 4871460

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Brennan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4871460 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 31 May 2024 · Published 31 May 2024 · Application 4871460

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Brennan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

[The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] immediately.
Jean Thompson must pay [The landlord/s] $20.44 immediately, being the filing application fee.
The landlord is to serve a copy of this order on the tenancy address.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing. There was no appearance by the tenant.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy, as the tenant has not left. Payment of rent has continued but that does not mean the tenancy continues beyond 19 April 2024.
The tenancy ended on 19 April 2024 after a landlord notice to terminate was correctly served on 17 January 2024., which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied. Application filing fee
Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.
I have ordered a copy delivered to the tenant as she has no active email account or telephone on record. Postal service will unfairly disadvantage both parties.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s64(1), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4871460 about?

The tribunal order states: [The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address

How much money was awarded in case 4871460?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4871460?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4871460?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10404516-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.