Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4885841 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 13 Feb 2025 · Published 13 Feb 2025 · Application 4885841

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

C Price

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4885841 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 13 Feb 2025 · Published 13 Feb 2025 · Application 4885841

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

C Price

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The Tribunal orders suppression of the landlord’s name and identifying details and the tenancy address.
The application is dismissed.

Reasons

The application was scheduled for a one-day face-to-face hearing on 13 February 2025, having been adjourned from 31 October 2024 at the tenant’s request.
At the start of the hearing, the parties’ names were called. The landlord attended the hearing, but the tenant did not attend the hearing. The hearing was paused for the Registrar to call the tenant to see if she was coming to the hearing. The Registrar was told by the tenant that the tenant would not be attending the hearing, due to childcare issues. The tenant did not provide any notice of this, nor did she request an adjournment of the hearing.
As, the applicant did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled, the application is dismissed. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. Suppression
As the tenant’s application is dismissed, I find the landlord’s interests outweigh the public interest in publishing their name. Therefore, I order that the landlord’s name, identifying details and the tenancy address are not to be published. See section 95A(4) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s78(1), s95A(4)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4885841 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal orders suppression of the landlord’s name and identifying details

How much money was awarded in case 4885841?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4885841?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4885841?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11429617-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.