Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4905014 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 6 Sept 2024 · Published 6 Sept 2024 · Application 4905014

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

K Lash

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4905014 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 6 Sept 2024 · Published 6 Sept 2024 · Application 4905014

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

K Lash

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The application is dismissed.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing.
Ms Smith did not answer the calls made to the phone number she provided as her own. Five calls were made during the hearing.
The landlord’s evidence is that the information provided in Ms Smith’s application form is incorrect. The tenancy only lasted three months in 2021 (not the three years alleged) and the tenancy agreement she provided with this application form is not the one used for the tenancy. He also pointed out a number of other inaccuracies in the application.
Further, consistently with the landlord’s evidence, there is no record of this tenant or tenancy at the Bond Centre.
This application is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Given the landlord was put to the time and effort of engaging in proceedings that were not pursued by the applicant, I consider it appropriate that his details be suppressed from the published order, however Ms Smiths will not be.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s78(1)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4905014 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is dismissed.

How much money was awarded in case 4905014?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4905014?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4905014?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10802361-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.