What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4919135 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 4919135?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4919135?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4919135?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10920787-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4919135 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 4919135?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4919135?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4919135?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10920787-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4919135 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Reasons

The Case Conference order dated 30 August 2024 sets out the background to the Tenant’s application.

The hearing took place in [Event location suppressed] on 2 October 2024. Both parties attended the hearing. [The landlord/s representative/s] represented the landlord.

[The tenant/s] application several raised issues that were causing stress to herself and her family at that time.

Having heard from both parties, I am satisfied that [The property management company] did not breach any legal duties that it owed to [The tenant/s] under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986. Specifically: a. The landlord has terminated the tenancy because they intend to put the property on the market for sale. I am satisfied the landlord was motivated by that intention, and not by the relatively minor maintenance issues that [The tenant/s] had raised around the time that the landlord issued the termination notice. b. The landlord did not exceed the maximum frequency of inspections, and it had reasonable grounds for issuing two breach notices during the tenancy, which triggered the right to re-inspections in addition to the usual routine inspections. c. The bond was lodged with the Bond Centre within 23-working days of receipt and is still being held by the Bond Centre, under the correct names.

The application was brought in good faith. [The tenant/s] sincerely wanted to clarify her rights as a tenant. Although she has not been successful in terms of proving any breach of a legal duty, she has been successful in that respect. [The tenant/s] is currently in temporary housing. It would be unjust if this order disadvantaged [The tenant/s] in her search for a new tenancy for her family.

I will grant name suppression to the tenant.

I will also grant name suppression to the landlord, on the grounds that they have been successful in the proceedings.

Reasons

The Case Conference order dated 30 August 2024 sets out the background to the Tenant’s application.

The hearing took place in [Event location suppressed] on 2 October 2024. Both parties attended the hearing. [The landlord/s representative/s] represented the landlord.

[The tenant/s] application several raised issues that were causing stress to herself and her family at that time.

I will grant name suppression to the tenant.

I will also grant name suppression to the landlord, on the grounds that they have been successful in the proceedings.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4919135 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 4919135 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Frequently asked questions