Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4931805 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 19 Nov 2025 · Published 19 Nov 2025 · Application 4931805

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kemp

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4931805 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 19 Nov 2025 · Published 19 Nov 2025 · Application 4931805

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kemp

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The Tribunal orders suppression of the applicant and the respondent’s name and identifying details in this case.

Reasons

This is an order made on the papers considering the suppression of identifying details in this case.
The Tribunal has issued previous orders in this application where the respondent has been awarded suppression of her identifying details.
Section 95A(4) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that: The Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published.
Earlier orders made in this application contain information that, when combined with the name of the applicant could lead to the identification of the respondent, who has been granted suppression.
In light of this, I have determined, on my own initiative, that the applicant’s name and other identifying details should also be suppressed in this case.
It is necessary and in the public interest that, when the publication of a party's name and identifying details could result in the identification of a party who is otherwise protected by a suppression order, that those details should also be suppressed.
Therefore, the Tribunal orders that the applicants’ name and identifying details, along with the respondent’s name and identifying details, in this application are suppressed.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s95A(4)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4931805 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal orders suppression of the applicant and the respondent’s name

How much money was awarded in case 4931805?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4931805?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4931805?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12119176-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

The Tribunal orders suppression of the applicant and the respondent’s name and identifying details in this case.

Reasons

This is an order made on the papers considering the suppression of identifying details in this case.
The Tribunal has issued previous orders in this application where the respondent has been awarded suppression of her identifying details.
Section 95A(4) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that: The Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published.
Earlier orders made in this application contain information that, when combined with the name of the applicant could lead to the identification of the respondent, who has been granted suppression.
In light of this, I have determined, on my own initiative, that the applicant’s name and other identifying details should also be suppressed in this case.
It is necessary and in the public interest that, when the publication of a party's name and identifying details could result in the identification of a party who is otherwise protected by a suppression order, that those details should also be suppressed.
Therefore, the Tribunal orders that the applicants’ name and identifying details, along with the respondent’s name and identifying details, in this application are suppressed.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s95A(4)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4931805 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal orders suppression of the applicant and the respondent’s name

How much money was awarded in case 4931805?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4931805?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4931805?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12119176-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.