How much money was awarded in case 4945879?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4945879?

The primary dispute was 14-day notice.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4945879?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10847950-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 4945879?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4945879?

The primary dispute was 14-day notice.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4945879?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10847950-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4945879 — 14-day notice

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4945879 about?

The tribunal order states: The Landlord’s request for termination of the tenancy of Amy Clare Beasley and

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

The Landlord’s request for termination of the tenancy of Amy Clare Beasley and Cameron Noel Ross Linkhorn at [Tenancy address suppressed] is not granted.

Amy Beasley is to have the current lock on the bedroom door changed to one that locks from the inside only. This change is to be made by 07 October 2024. If the tenant does not make the change of lock by that date, the landlord may change the lock after that date and charge the tenant the cost of that work.

Amy Beasley has paid for window repairs and is waiting for the tradesperson. If the window glass is not repaired by 7 October 2024, the landlord may have the repairs carried out after that date and charge the tenant the cost of that work.

Amy Beasley is to make sure that vehicles are not dismantled at the property.

Amy Beasley is to make sure that vehicles do not drive on the lawn or park on the lawn. She is to restore the lawn to its condition at the start of the tenancy. If the lawn is not restored by 1 January 2025, the landlord have a contractor carry out remedial work and charge the tenant the cost of that work.

The tenant is to fix the accordion doors. If they are not able to be repaired the cost of replacement less depreciation could be taken from the bond at the end of the tenancy. However the landlord is not entitled to betterment (new for old) when items are damaged during a tenancy.

Reasons

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on by today the tenant has remedied or arranged for the remedy of most matters raised by the landlord.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the items that are of concern to the landlord are not of sufficient seriousness to end the tenancy.

Should items be remedied?

There are outstanding items that need to be remedied that have been listed in the order above. These are able to be ordered because they are either damage or breaches of the tenant’s responsibility to keep the premises reasonably clean and tidy. Name Suppression

Because the landlord has wholly succeeded proving that at the time of the first hearing there were breaches of section 40 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, the landlord’s request for name suppression is granted. (see Section 95A(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986).

Order

The Landlord’s request for termination of the tenancy of Amy Clare Beasley and Cameron Noel Ross Linkhorn at [Tenancy address suppressed] is not granted.

Amy Beasley is to make sure that vehicles are not dismantled at the property.

Reasons

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on by today the tenant has remedied or arranged for the remedy of most matters raised by the landlord.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because the items that are of concern to the landlord are not of sufficient seriousness to end the tenancy.

Should items be remedied?

Tenancy Tribunal case 4945879 — 14-day notice

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4945879 — 14-day notice

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Should items be remedied?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Should items be remedied?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions