Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4962773 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 29 Aug 2024 · Published 29 Aug 2024 · Application 4962773

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

K Koller

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4962773 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 29 Aug 2024 · Published 29 Aug 2024 · Application 4962773

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

K Koller

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.
The application is amended to show the current tenants and the landlord as named on the tenancy agreement. A copy of this order will be sent to everyone.
The application was set down so I can decide whether the Tribunal can hear the claim. Section 77(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear claims between landlords and tenants relating to any tenancy to which the Act applies.
Having heard from the parties it is clear to me that this is a dispute between tenants. The landlord does not live at the tenancy address. The tenant named as a respondent in the application is not a landlord. This means the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to decide the matter.
I allow suppression for both parties. This is because any public interest is in the law and not the names. See 95A RTA.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s77(1)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4962773 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction.

How much money was awarded in case 4962773?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4962773?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4962773?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10767987-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.