Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4964895 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 21 Aug 2024 · Published 21 Aug 2024 · Application 4964895

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Brennan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 4964895 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 21 Aug 2024 · Published 21 Aug 2024 · Application 4964895

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Brennan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

[The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] at 08:00am Monday 26 August 2024.
Douglas Vau'ae must pay [The landlord/s] $27.00 immediately, being the application filing fee.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
The tenancy ended on 6 August 2024, which is less than 90 days ago. The end was via a landlord notice to terminate, citing s 51(2)(c) Residential Tenancies Act 1986, that the landlord is not the owner of the premises and the landlord’s interest in the premises is due to end.
The landlord confirmed this interest has ended. The tenant is in discussion with the owner and a new tenancy agreement between the two may be made. If so, this possession order may become moot. In the alternative, this order may be enforced as required.
The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied. Filing fee
Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s51(2), s64(1), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4964895 about?

The tribunal order states: [The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address

How much money was awarded in case 4964895?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4964895?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4964895?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10736736-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.