What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4972015 about?

The tribunal order states: The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $520.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to

How much money was awarded in case 4972015?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4972015?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4972015?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10741621-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4972015 about?

The tribunal order states: The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $520.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to

How much money was awarded in case 4972015?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4972015?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4972015?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10741621-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4972015 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $520.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to Oaks Property Management Limited immediately. That payment covers the final rent arrears of the same dollar amount.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing, conducted via telephone.
The tenant is currently residing in [suppressed] to care for a family member.
This was a long tenancy. The tenant made a final payment that, in conjunction with the bond being released to the landlord, would have cleared rent arrears.
For reasons that are unclear, this matter progressed to a hearing today despite the prior mutual agreement on resolution. It is considered more than likely an internal administrative issue with the landlord. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
Further, the Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. I have declined landlord suppression as the application was not necessary given the agreement to settle the final rent arrears. The landlord committed to internally querying how the application progressed to this hearing.
I consider it appropriate to exercise my own initiative and order suppression of the tenant’s name.
For the above reasons, I decline to make any order for the filing fee to be paid by the tenant. That stays with the applicant.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4972015 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4972015 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions