How much money was awarded in case 5002129?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5002129?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5002129?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12156415-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5002129?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5002129?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5002129?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12156415-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

2959 Cheltenham Hunterville Road, Cheltenham, RD 7, Tenancy Tribunal Case 5002129 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5002129 about?

The tribunal order states: The Tribunal orders suppression of the parties’ names and identifying details.

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

The Tribunal orders suppression of the parties’ names and identifying details.

The tenant agrees to pay the landlord $5,500.00 (“the debt”) in settlement of all claims either the tenant or the landlord may have arising out of the tenancy. This sum is payable immediately.

The tenant is unable to pay the debt immediately. The landlord accepts the tenant’s offer to make payment of the debt initially by weekly payments of $30.00 starting on Tuesday 29 July 2025.

The parties agree to review the tenant’s ability to increase the payments being made in February 2026.

If the tenant does not make payment of any instalment she has agreed within 48-hours of a due date, the balance of the debt shall become payable immediately. This Order shall continue until the debt has been repaid.

After 4 pm Thursday 24 July 2025 the landlord may dispose of any goods left at the premises by the tenant as the landlord sees fit.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.

The parties agreed on the terms of this order during the hearing. The parties could have been referred to mediation so that their agreement could be recorded in a mediated order. In that event, the order and the parties’ names would not have been published. Referral to mediation would have postponed the resolution of this dispute and would have involved both parties in the cost of further time spent at a mediation conference.

The Tribunal is satisfied that the parties have been able to come to this agreement of their own free will, that it is fair on the evidence which it has heard and that it is a satisfactory outcome for both parties.

As the parties reached agreement by consent at the hearing and there are no matters of public interest in this order, it is appropriate that the parties’ names are suppressed.

One of the landlord’s claims against the tenant was for the reinstatement of power to the property. The parties accepted that this was caused by the tenant’s contractor who cut a tree branch that then broke the power line connection to the property.

The tenant is responsible to the landlord for the costs of reinstatement. However, the damage was caused carelessly and so the tenant’s liability is limited to four weeks’ rent or $1,280.00. This sum is included in the sum agreed between the parties as being payable by the tenant to the landlord.

Order

The Tribunal orders suppression of the parties’ names and identifying details.

The tenant agrees to pay the landlord $5,500.00 (“the debt”) in settlement of all claims either the tenant or the landlord may have arising out of the tenancy. This sum is payable immediately.

The tenant is unable to pay the debt immediately. The landlord accepts the tenant’s offer to make payment of the debt initially by weekly payments of $30.00 starting on Tuesday 29 July 2025.

The parties agree to review the tenant’s ability to increase the payments being made in February 2026.

After 4 pm Thursday 24 July 2025 the landlord may dispose of any goods left at the premises by the tenant as the landlord sees fit.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.

As the parties reached agreement by consent at the hearing and there are no matters of public interest in this order, it is appropriate that the parties’ names are suppressed.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5002129 — Tenancy dispute at 2959 Cheltenham Hunterville Road, Cheltenham, RD 7,

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5002129 — Tenancy dispute at 2959 Cheltenham Hunterville Road, Cheltenham, RD 7,

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Frequently asked questions