How much money was awarded in case 5007711?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5007711?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5007711?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10922867-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5007711?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5007711?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5007711?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10922867-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 5007711 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5007711 about?

The tribunal order states: [The landlord/s] must take any personal documents belonging to the tenant, that

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

[The landlord/s] must take any personal documents belonging to the tenant, that have been left at the premises, to the nearest Police station and obtain a receipt for them.

The landlord shall dispose of the other goods left at the premises by the tenant by: a. selling all goods with a saleable value by public auction or by private contract at a reasonable market price, and b. disposing of all goods with no saleable value as the landlord sees fit.

[The landlord/s] must pay the proceeds of any sale to the Bond Centre together with a copy of this order.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing by video call.

The tenant was telephoned on the phone number provided but the phone call went unanswered. I am satisfied the tenant was properly served with notice of the hearing. The hearing proceeded in his absence. Disposal of abandoned goods

The landlord has applied for the disposal of goods that the tenant left at the premises at the end of the tenancy.

The landlord has tried to get the tenant to remove goods which consist of: a. A fridge with an estimated market value of $150.00 b. A lawn mower with an estimated market value of $50.00. c. A washing machine with an estimated market value of $150.00. d. A microwave with an estimated market value of $50.00. e. An empty computer box with an estimated market value of $50.00. f. A damaged television with an estimated market value of $100.00.

The landlord has not assessed to see if any of the items are in working order. My experience is that if electrical goods are not working then they have no saleable value (especially when the estimated values set out are so low anyway)

The landlord has been unable to contact the tenant.

It is not practicable for the landlord to the return the goods to the tenant. Some of the goods may have a value above the cost of storing, transporting and selling them. The landlord must sell these goods at a reasonable market price.

The landlord must pay the balance to the Bond Centre. See sections 62(3)(b), 62B(2),(3) and (4), 62C(1)(b),(2) and (3) Residential Tenancies Act 1986).

The landlord may dispose of any goods that have no saleable value.

Because the landlord has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

The landlord sought suppression and as the application is successful, I have made an order accordingly.

Order

[The landlord/s] must take any personal documents belonging to the tenant, that have been left at the premises, to the nearest Police station and obtain a receipt for them.

[The landlord/s] must pay the proceeds of any sale to the Bond Centre together with a copy of this order.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing by video call.

The landlord has applied for the disposal of goods that the tenant left at the premises at the end of the tenancy.

The landlord has been unable to contact the tenant.

The landlord must pay the balance to the Bond Centre. See sections 62(3)(b), 62B(2),(3) and (4), 62C(1)(b),(2) and (3) Residential Tenancies Act 1986).

The landlord may dispose of any goods that have no saleable value.

Because the landlord has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

The landlord sought suppression and as the application is successful, I have made an order accordingly.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5007711 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5007711 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions