How much money was awarded in case 5061613?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5061613?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5061613?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11109785-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5061613?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5061613?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5061613?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11109785-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 5061613 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5061613 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant’s name and identifying details.
Pgg Wrightson Real Estate Limited As Agent For Harriett Keatley And Hine-Wai Loose is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] immediately.
[The tenant/s] must pay PGG Wrightson Real Estate Limited as agent for Harriett Keatley and Hine-Wai Loose $27.00 immediately to reimburse the filing fee of this application.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing which took place by telephone.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
I heard how the application is made in the names of the two present owners. I heard from the landlord how they inherited the property from their father who was named on the original tenancy agreement. I was provided with the property management agreement for those parties and PGG Wrightson and also details relating to their ownership of the property. On the basis of this evidence I am satisfied that Harriett Keatley and Hine-Wai Loose are the landlords and entitled to make this application. Possession
A landlord may terminate a periodic tenancy by giving at least 90 days’ notice if the premises are to be put on the market by the owner within 90 days after the termination date for the purposes of sale or other disposition (section 51(2)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA)).
The landlord says they placed a notice terminating the tenancy on this basis in the tenant’s mailbox after speaking to him on the telephone on 1 August 2024. A copy was provided to the Tribunal.
The notice terminated the tenancy on 1 November 2024. The landlord provided a copy of the agency agreement in place for the sale of the property.
I am satisfied that the requirements of section 51(2)(a) are proven. The notice is therefore valid and the tenancy ended in accordance with this notice on 1 November 2024 that is less than 90 days ago.
The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied.
I heard from the tenant about difficulties he was having moving out and finding a new home. This is unfortunate but the landlord is now entitled to possession. Filing fee
As the landlord has been wholly successful, I award the landlord reimbursement of the filing fee. Suppression
The Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published (s 95A(4) RTA).
The landlord asked for the tenant to be given name suppression because it would help him find a new property and they also ‘feel for him’. The tenant says he has not stayed at the property on purpose but that he was struggling to find a suitable home to move into and given his older age he had much to move and would need help. The tenant wants suppression.
I award the tenant name suppression because the landlord has encouraged this and they are the party who has been most impacted by him not leaving the premises. I find there is limited public interest in the tenant’s name given all of the circumstances.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant’s name and identifying details.

Pgg Wrightson Real Estate Limited As Agent For Harriett Keatley And Hine-Wai Loose is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] immediately.

[The tenant/s] must pay PGG Wrightson Real Estate Limited as agent for Harriett Keatley and Hine-Wai Loose $27.00 immediately to reimburse the filing fee of this application.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing which took place by telephone.

The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.

I heard how the application is made in the names of the two present owners. I heard from the landlord how they inherited the property from their father who was named on the original tenancy agreement. I was provided with the property management agreement for those parties and PGG Wrightson and also details relating to their ownership of the property. On the basis of this evidence I am satisfied that Harriett Keatley and Hine-Wai Loose are the landlords and entitled to make this application. Possession

A landlord may terminate a periodic tenancy by giving at least 90 days’ notice if the premises are to be put on the market by the owner within 90 days after the termination date for the purposes of sale or other disposition (section 51(2)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA)).

The landlord says they placed a notice terminating the tenancy on this basis in the tenant’s mailbox after speaking to him on the telephone on 1 August 2024. A copy was provided to the Tribunal.

The notice terminated the tenancy on 1 November 2024. The landlord provided a copy of the agency agreement in place for the sale of the property.

I am satisfied that the requirements of section 51(2)(a) are proven. The notice is therefore valid and the tenancy ended in accordance with this notice on 1 November 2024 that is less than 90 days ago.

The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied.

I heard from the tenant about difficulties he was having moving out and finding a new home. This is unfortunate but the landlord is now entitled to possession. Filing fee

As the landlord has been wholly successful, I award the landlord reimbursement of the filing fee. Suppression

The Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published (s 95A(4) RTA).

The landlord asked for the tenant to be given name suppression because it would help him find a new property and they also ‘feel for him’. The tenant says he has not stayed at the property on purpose but that he was struggling to find a suitable home to move into and given his older age he had much to move and would need help. The tenant wants suppression.

I award the tenant name suppression because the landlord has encouraged this and they are the party who has been most impacted by him not leaving the premises. I find there is limited public interest in the tenant’s name given all of the circumstances.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5061613 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5061613 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions