Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5075829 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 27 Nov 2024 · Published 27 Nov 2024 · Application 5075829

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

A Macpherson

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5075829 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 27 Nov 2024 · Published 27 Nov 2024 · Application 5075829

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

A Macpherson

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant name and identifying details.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $3,000.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to [The tenant/s] immediately.
Rentex Limited Ha Lee must pay [The tenant/s] $27.00 immediately, being the filing fee for this application.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing by teleconference.
The tenant has applied for refund of the bond. The landlord has a claim against the bond, but has not filed a counterclaim with Tenancy Services.
Section 22B(2) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that, where a tenant applies for refund of the bond, and the landlord seeks payment from the bond, the landlord must file an application setting out the details of the counterclaim.
Because the landlord has not filed a counterclaim the bond is refunded in full to the tenant.
The landlord indicated they will be filing a claim against the tenant for compensation of $477.02 for a tile repair.
As the tenant has wholly succeeded with the claim, they are entitled to name suppression as requested on their application form.
The landlord must reimburse the filing fee.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s22B(2)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5075829 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5075829?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5075829?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5075829?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11136154-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.