Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5117648 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 7 Mar 2025 · Published 7 Mar 2025 · Application 5117648

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5117648 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 7 Mar 2025 · Published 7 Mar 2025 · Application 5117648

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kan

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the [Landlord] name and identifying details.
By consent, the tenancy of [The tenant/s] at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 pm, Friday, 7 March 2024.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.
[The tenant/s support people] were the support persons for the tenant, [The tenant/s].
[The landlord’s representative] was the landlord's representative. [The landlord’s support person] was the support person.
By consent, the parties agreed on when [The tenant/s] would vacate the premises.
[The tenant/s] could vacate the premises earlier by working with the landlord. Filing fee
Because the parties reached an agreement, there would be no reimbursement of the filing fee. Name suppression
The circumstances of the landlord’s application are unusual. I do not consider it is in the public interest to publish [The tenant/s] name.
In my view, it would be unfair to [The tenant/s] and contrary to the public interest if his name is published.
Accordingly, I order the suppression of [The tenant/s] name.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5117648 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5117648?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5117648?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5117648?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11404530-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.