What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5147251 about?

The tribunal order states: Khat Investments Limited is granted possession of the premises at 37 Don

How much money was awarded in case 5147251?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5147251?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5147251?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11418962-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5147251 about?

The tribunal order states: Khat Investments Limited is granted possession of the premises at 37 Don

How much money was awarded in case 5147251?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5147251?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5147251?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11418962-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

37 Don Street, Oamaru North, Oamaru 9400 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5147251 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Reasons

The directors of the applicant company attended the hearing. The other party did not attend.

The applicant company purchased the property on 17 January 2025 following a sale initiated by the mortgagee.

The record of title shows Khat Investments Limited as the registered owner.

Ms Syme, the former owner, has remained at the premises and is now a squatter in possession. The law

Even though there is no tenancy agreement between the parties, the Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant possession to the registered owner of the property under section 65 of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA) which provides: 65 Eviction of squatters (1) Where, on the application of any person entitled to possession of any residential premises, the Tribunal is satisfied that any other person is in possession of the premises as a squatter or trespasser, or otherwise than pursuant to any right of occupation granted to that person by any person having lawful authority to grant that right to that other person, the Tribunal shall make a possession order granting possession of the premises to the applicant. (2) Nothing in subsection (1) shall limit or affect the provisions of the Trespass Act 1980, or any other remedy that may be available to the person lawfully entitled to possession of the premises. (3) To avoid doubt, the Tribunal has jurisdiction under this section even though the premises are not subject to a tenancy agreement.

The applicant company as the registered owner of the premises is entitled to immediate possession of these residential premises. Result

The Tribunal grants the applicant company immediate possession of the premises at 37 Don Street, Oamaru North, Oamaru today pursuant to section 65 RTA and section 138 of the District Courts Act 2016. The usual 48-hour delay before the order can be enforced does not therefore apply.

Reasons

The directors of the applicant company attended the hearing. The other party did not attend.

The applicant company purchased the property on 17 January 2025 following a sale initiated by the mortgagee.

The record of title shows Khat Investments Limited as the registered owner.

Ms Syme, the former owner, has remained at the premises and is now a squatter in possession. The law

The applicant company as the registered owner of the premises is entitled to immediate possession of these residential premises. Result

Tenancy Tribunal case 5147251 — Tenancy dispute at 37 Don Street, Oamaru North, Oamaru 9400

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5147251 — Tenancy dispute at 37 Don Street, Oamaru North, Oamaru 9400

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions