Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5157060 — Tenancy dispute
Decided 6 Jun 2025 · Published 6 Jun 2025 · Application 5157060
Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Location
New Zealand
Tribunal region
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the [Landlord] name and identifying details.
- The application for rehearing is dismissed.
Reasons
- [The landlord’s representative] attended the hearing via teleconference.
- I attempted to contact Ms. Goodridge using two mobile numbers on record, both of which were unsuccessful. I then attempted to reach her via a landline, which was also unsuccessful. The pattern of non-engaging is similar to the hearing on 01 April 2025.
- The applicant for the rehearing application, Ms. Goodridge, did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal that the matter had been settled. Refer to sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
- Accordingly, Ms Goodridge’s rehearing application is dismissed.