Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5175193 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 18 Aug 2025 · Published 18 Aug 2025 · Application 5175193

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

N Bradley

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5175193 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 18 Aug 2025 · Published 18 Aug 2025 · Application 5175193

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

N Bradley

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the parties name and identifying details.
The tenant’s applications are withdrawn.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.
The tenant has filed two applications, one for work orders and another for compensation.
The tenant is currently facing a number of health issues which has meant he has been unable to file his evidence and clarify his claims and he would have difficulty attending a hearing in the short term.
The tenant elected to withdraw his claims and the landlord agreed this could be on a without prejudice basis to allow him to refile the claims when he is well.
However, the tenant on notice that if he refiles his application again, that he must file his evidence at the same time as the application will likely be set down for a hearing without any further adjournment to file evidence. This is because there has been two hearings and a case conference for this matter already in this application.
As the application is withdrawn, I make an order suppressing both parties names and identifying details. 1

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5175193 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5175193?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5175193?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5175193?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12278763-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the parties name and identifying details.
The tenant’s applications are withdrawn.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing.
The tenant has filed two applications, one for work orders and another for compensation.
The tenant is currently facing a number of health issues which has meant he has been unable to file his evidence and clarify his claims and he would have difficulty attending a hearing in the short term.
The tenant elected to withdraw his claims and the landlord agreed this could be on a without prejudice basis to allow him to refile the claims when he is well.
However, the tenant on notice that if he refiles his application again, that he must file his evidence at the same time as the application will likely be set down for a hearing without any further adjournment to file evidence. This is because there has been two hearings and a case conference for this matter already in this application.
As the application is withdrawn, I make an order suppressing both parties names and identifying details. 1

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5175193 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5175193?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5175193?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5175193?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12278763-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.