Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5201151 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 20 May 2025 · Published 20 May 2025 · Application 5201151

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kemp

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5201151 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 20 May 2025 · Published 20 May 2025 · Application 5201151

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

M Kemp

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the landlord name and identifying details.
The application is dismissed.

Reasons

Only the landlord attended the hearing.
The applicant did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
I am satisfied she has been served and has had notice of the hearing. She has therefore chosen not to attend.
The application is dismissed.
The landlord seeks name suppression of their identifying details (section 95A RTA). The Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case. The landlord has been wholly successful and suppression is therefore awarded.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s78(1), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5201151 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5201151?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5201151?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5201151?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11868093-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the landlord name and identifying details.
The application is dismissed.

Reasons

Only the landlord attended the hearing.
The applicant did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
I am satisfied she has been served and has had notice of the hearing. She has therefore chosen not to attend.
The application is dismissed.
The landlord seeks name suppression of their identifying details (section 95A RTA). The Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case. The landlord has been wholly successful and suppression is therefore awarded.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s78(1), s95A

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5201151 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5201151?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5201151?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5201151?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11868093-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.