How much money was awarded in case 5230456?

The reconciled net award was $27.00.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5230456?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5230456?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11993064-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5230456?

The reconciled net award was $27.00.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5230456?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5230456?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11993064-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Unit/Flat 1, 101 Long Drive, St Heliers, Auckland 1071 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5230456 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5230456 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant and Landlords’ names and identifying details.

The tenancy of [The tenant/s] at Unit/Flat 1, 101 Long Drive, St Heliers, Auckland 1071 is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at

59pm on Monday 30 June 2025.

[The tenant/s] must pay [The landlord/s] $27.00 immediately for the filing fee.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing – the landlord by phone and the tenant’s representative by video conference.

The landlords have applied for termination of the tenancy on the grounds that they had given the tenant a valid notice of termination which was due to expire in March 2025.

The tenant remains in the property and I heard from his representative at today’s hearing that he has been unable to yet find somewhere else to live because it was only last week that a needs assessor assessed him for rest home accommodation.

At today’s hearing it was agreed that a valid notice of termination had been given. It was further agreed that possession of the property would be delayed until Monday 30 June 2025.

Both parties have applied for suppression of their names.

Section 95A of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that: (1) The Tribunal may, on the application of any party to the proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published. (2) An order may be subject to any conditions that the Tribunal considers appropriate. (3) If a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in the proceedings applies for an order that their name or identifying particulars not be published, the Tribunal must make the order unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest, or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.

I am granting suppression of the landlords’ names because they were wholly successful in their claim against the tenant – see s95A(3). For the same reason I am ordering the tenant to reimburse them the filing fee.

I am also granting suppression of the tenant’s name pursuant to s95A(1). I accept that the tenant suffers from very poor health and I see no public interest whatsoever in having his name published. C ter Haar 17 June 2025

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant and Landlords’ names and identifying details.

The tenancy of [The tenant/s] at Unit/Flat 1, 101 Long Drive, St Heliers, Auckland 1071 is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at

59pm on Monday 30 June 2025.

[The tenant/s] must pay [The landlord/s] $27.00 immediately for the filing fee.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing – the landlord by phone and the tenant’s representative by video conference.

The landlords have applied for termination of the tenancy on the grounds that they had given the tenant a valid notice of termination which was due to expire in March 2025.

At today’s hearing it was agreed that a valid notice of termination had been given. It was further agreed that possession of the property would be delayed until Monday 30 June 2025.

Both parties have applied for suppression of their names.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5230456 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat 1, 101 Long Drive, St Heliers, Auckland 1071

At a glance

Award balance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5230456 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat 1, 101 Long Drive, St Heliers, Auckland 1071

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions