Tenantcheck Insights
Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Decided 18 Jul 2025 · Published 18 Jul 2025 · Application 5237512
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Location
Rotorua
Tribunal region
Adjudicator
R Kee
Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Decided 18 Jul 2025 · Published 18 Jul 2025 · Application 5237512
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Location
Rotorua
Tribunal region
Adjudicator
R Kee
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
of a kind referred to in subsection (3) in any of the following cases: (a) where, in the opinion of the Tribunal, the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious or ought not to have been brought: (b) where any of the parties was represented by counsel:
(c) where, in the opinion of the Tribunal, the matter in dispute ought reasonably to have been settled before the Tenancy Mediator but that the party against whom the order is to be made refused, without reasonable excuse, to take part in proceedings before a Tenancy Mediator or acted in any such proceedings in a contemptuous or improper manner: (d) where any applicant to the Tribunal, after receiving notice of the hearing, fails to attend the hearing without good cause.
given in the Tribunal’s substantive decision. .
Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).
s102, s102(2), s11(3)
Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.
The tribunal order states: of a kind referred to in subsection (3) in any of the
Verified claim lines are listed on this page.
The primary dispute was Rent arrears. Related themes: Unit Titles.
The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12140033-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
of a kind referred to in subsection (3) in any of the following cases: (a) where, in the opinion of the Tribunal, the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious or ought not to have been brought: (b) where any of the parties was represented by counsel:
(c) where, in the opinion of the Tribunal, the matter in dispute ought reasonably to have been settled before the Tenancy Mediator but that the party against whom the order is to be made refused, without reasonable excuse, to take part in proceedings before a Tenancy Mediator or acted in any such proceedings in a contemptuous or improper manner: (d) where any applicant to the Tribunal, after receiving notice of the hearing, fails to attend the hearing without good cause.
given in the Tribunal’s substantive decision. .
Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).
s102, s102(2), s11(3)
Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.
The tribunal order states: of a kind referred to in subsection (3) in any of the
Verified claim lines are listed on this page.
The primary dispute was Rent arrears. Related themes: Unit Titles.
The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12140033-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.
