Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5259699 — Tenancy dispute
Decided 14 Jan 2026 · Published 14 Jan 2026 · Application 5259699
Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Adjudicator
S Young
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
- The application is dismissed.
Reasons
- Neither party attended the remote hearing.
- Orders had previously been made by the Tribunal on 24 June 2025 in favour of the landlord. The landlord’s application was then adjourned for the landlord to provide further evidence in support of their claim for compensation.
- The matter was adjourned on a second occasion as the evidence was still not available. On that occasion, the landlord indicated that it should be available to upload to the Tribunal by no later than 18 November 2025.
- No further evidence has been uploaded to the file by the landlord.
- The landlord did not attend the hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
- The remaining landlord claims are dismissed.
- The landlord had previously applied to the Tribunal for name suppression. Previous orders had not been published as they included an adjournment. The landlord has been substantially successful in this matter and suppression of the landlord’s name and details is ordered.