Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5281579 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 27 Jun 2025 · Published 27 Jun 2025 · Application 5281579

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

S Young

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5281579 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 27 Jun 2025 · Published 27 Jun 2025 · Application 5281579

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

S Young

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
[The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] immediately.

Reasons

Both parties attended the remote hearing on 27 June 2025.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
The tenancy ended on 8 June 2025. The landlord had served a notice to terminate the tenancy on the tenant. That notice expired on 8 June 2025, which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”) are satisfied.
The tenant explained that unfortunately she has not been able to obtain alternative accommodation.
Section 64(1) RTA states that on the application of any person entitled to possession of the premises following the termination of a tenancy, the Tribunal shall make an order granting possession of the premises to that person (the emphasis is mine). The Tribunal retains no discretion in the matter. The landlord is entitled to possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy and accordingly an order is made granting possession of the premises to the landlord.
Both parties applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this matter and suppression of the landlord’s name and details is ordered. The tenant has not been wholly or substantially successful in this hearing and the tenant’s application for name suppression is dismissed.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s64(1)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5281579 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5281579?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5281579?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5281579?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12040435-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
[The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] immediately.

Reasons

Both parties attended the remote hearing on 27 June 2025.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
The tenancy ended on 8 June 2025. The landlord had served a notice to terminate the tenancy on the tenant. That notice expired on 8 June 2025, which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”) are satisfied.
The tenant explained that unfortunately she has not been able to obtain alternative accommodation.
Section 64(1) RTA states that on the application of any person entitled to possession of the premises following the termination of a tenancy, the Tribunal shall make an order granting possession of the premises to that person (the emphasis is mine). The Tribunal retains no discretion in the matter. The landlord is entitled to possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy and accordingly an order is made granting possession of the premises to the landlord.
Both parties applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this matter and suppression of the landlord’s name and details is ordered. The tenant has not been wholly or substantially successful in this hearing and the tenant’s application for name suppression is dismissed.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s64(1)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5281579 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5281579?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5281579?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5281579?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12040435-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.