Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5294899 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 16 Oct 2025 · Published 16 Oct 2025 · Application 5294899

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

N Maplesden

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5294899 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 16 Oct 2025 · Published 16 Oct 2025 · Application 5294899

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

N Maplesden

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord and Tenant names and identifying details.
The landlord’s claims relating to damage to grassed areas and to the garage door are dismissed.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,400.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) immediately apportioned as follows: [The landlord/s]: $1,927.25 [The tenant/s]: $472.75

Reasons

I made an order on 16 September 2025 after a hearing held that day.
The first order decided most of the claims. I allowed the landlord additional time to submit new evidence related to a claim for compensation to the garage door. If no new evidence was supplied, I directed that I would dismiss the claim.
The landlord has not submitted new evidence.
I therefore dismiss the claim for compensation relating to damage to the garage door. There is no evidence that the landlord has suffered a loss.
I also dismiss a claim to recover the costs of regrassing a small area on the lawn where the tenants had reportedly stored the recycling bin and rubbish bin.
The area is minimal and putting rubbish bins on grass is a normal residential activity. If a landlord wants to direct tenants to store bins in a certain place, it should clearly state this in the tenancy agreement or other written instructions. Refund of the bond
My first order awarded compensation of $1,927.25 to the landlords to be paid from the bond.
My orders today mean that the balance of the bond is to be refunded to the tenants.
I suppress both landlord and tenant names as I did in the first order and for the same reasons.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5294899 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5294899?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5294899?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5294899?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12450942-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord and Tenant names and identifying details.
The landlord’s claims relating to damage to grassed areas and to the garage door are dismissed.
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,400.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) immediately apportioned as follows: [The landlord/s]: $1,927.25 [The tenant/s]: $472.75

Reasons

I made an order on 16 September 2025 after a hearing held that day.
The first order decided most of the claims. I allowed the landlord additional time to submit new evidence related to a claim for compensation to the garage door. If no new evidence was supplied, I directed that I would dismiss the claim.
The landlord has not submitted new evidence.
I therefore dismiss the claim for compensation relating to damage to the garage door. There is no evidence that the landlord has suffered a loss.
I also dismiss a claim to recover the costs of regrassing a small area on the lawn where the tenants had reportedly stored the recycling bin and rubbish bin.
The area is minimal and putting rubbish bins on grass is a normal residential activity. If a landlord wants to direct tenants to store bins in a certain place, it should clearly state this in the tenancy agreement or other written instructions. Refund of the bond
My first order awarded compensation of $1,927.25 to the landlords to be paid from the bond.
My orders today mean that the balance of the bond is to be refunded to the tenants.
I suppress both landlord and tenant names as I did in the first order and for the same reasons.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5294899 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5294899?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5294899?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5294899?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12450942-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.