Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5333662 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 10 Sept 2025 · Published 10 Sept 2025 · Application 5333662

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

K Stirling

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5333662 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 10 Sept 2025 · Published 10 Sept 2025 · Application 5333662

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

K Stirling

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord name and identifying details.
[The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] at 11.59pm on Sunday 28 September 2025.
Theresa Rose Macpherson must pay [The landlord/s] $28.00 immediately, being the filing fee on the application.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing by telephone. The Tribunal called the tenant on the cell phone number provided for her in the application but the calls diverted to voicemail. I am satisfied that the tenant received notice of the heraing and did not attend.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
The tenancy ended on 27 August 2025 which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied.
The landlord has previously agreed to give the tenant an extension of time to vacate the premises by 28 September 2025 and, therefore, does not seek an immediate possession order.
Because [The applicant/s] has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s64(1)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5333662 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5333662?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5333662?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5333662?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12392975-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord name and identifying details.
[The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at [Tenancy address suppressed] at 11.59pm on Sunday 28 September 2025.
Theresa Rose Macpherson must pay [The landlord/s] $28.00 immediately, being the filing fee on the application.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing by telephone. The Tribunal called the tenant on the cell phone number provided for her in the application but the calls diverted to voicemail. I am satisfied that the tenant received notice of the heraing and did not attend.
The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
The tenancy ended on 27 August 2025 which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied.
The landlord has previously agreed to give the tenant an extension of time to vacate the premises by 28 September 2025 and, therefore, does not seek an immediate possession order.
Because [The applicant/s] has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s64(1)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5333662 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5333662?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5333662?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5333662?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12392975-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.