What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5336302 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5336302?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5336302?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5336302?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12700958-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5336302 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5336302?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5336302?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5336302?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12700958-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 5336302 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference. Two calls to the tenant went unanswered and to voicemail. After the first call went to voicemail, a brief message was left introducing myself and explaining the purpose of the call. The message concluded with the advice I would try a second time after waiting some minutes. I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the second call also went unanswered.

To confirm, the telephone number called was as provided by the tenant in her rehearing application. The application form advises any change to the details provided must be advised. I also attempted to call the original number as provided in the landlord application.

On 1 October 2025 the Tribunal made the first order for possession.

On around 8 October 2025, the tenant applied for a rehearing on the grounds that she had not received notice of the hearing and was unable to attend due to the contact details being incorrect. This was granted and a rehearing set down for today.

The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.

The landlord served a notice to terminate on 23 May 2025. That notice is valid. The tenant remains at the premises.

The tenancy ended on 26 August 2025, which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied. Suppression

Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.

The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.

Reasons

On 1 October 2025 the Tribunal made the first order for possession.

The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.

The landlord served a notice to terminate on 23 May 2025. That notice is valid. The tenant remains at the premises.

The tenancy ended on 26 August 2025, which is less than 90 days ago. The requirements of section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 are satisfied. Suppression

The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5336302 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5336302 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions