Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5348023 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 26 Nov 2025 · Published 26 Nov 2025 · Application 5348023

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

S Munro

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 5348023 — Tenancy dispute

Decided 26 Nov 2025 · Published 26 Nov 2025 · Application 5348023

Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

New Zealand

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

S Munro

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

Given the nature of these proceedings, the Tribunal orders suppression of the parties name and identifying details.
The application is dismissed.

Reasons

This application is bought by a tenant against another tenant for the retention of the bond.
The tenancy came to an end given there was domestic violence. The alleged victim remains in the tenancy and the exiting tenant will not sign over the bond to her. The applicant seeks the bond given she says he owes her money. The bond and tenancy agreement were in joint names.
The exiting tenant was unable to be contacted however after discussing the jurisdiction issues and contacting the property manager who was not named as a party, the applicant decided to withdraw her claim. Therefore, the claim is dismissed.
The property manager is required to end the tenancy in the normal way and start a new tenancy with the person now in occupation. If a tenant has an issue with the other tenant, as stated, the Disputes Tribunal may assist or depending on the circumstances the Family Court.
As stated, the Tenant who bought the application subsequently withdrew her application in any event and therefore the application is dismissed.
It is appropriate given the circumstances to suppress all details in relation to the case.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5348023 about?

The tribunal order states: Given the nature of these proceedings, the Tribunal orders suppression of the

How much money was awarded in case 5348023?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5348023?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5348023?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12769340-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Order

Given the nature of these proceedings, the Tribunal orders suppression of the parties name and identifying details.
The application is dismissed.

Reasons

This application is bought by a tenant against another tenant for the retention of the bond.
The tenancy came to an end given there was domestic violence. The alleged victim remains in the tenancy and the exiting tenant will not sign over the bond to her. The applicant seeks the bond given she says he owes her money. The bond and tenancy agreement were in joint names.
The exiting tenant was unable to be contacted however after discussing the jurisdiction issues and contacting the property manager who was not named as a party, the applicant decided to withdraw her claim. Therefore, the claim is dismissed.
The property manager is required to end the tenancy in the normal way and start a new tenancy with the person now in occupation. If a tenant has an issue with the other tenant, as stated, the Disputes Tribunal may assist or depending on the circumstances the Family Court.
As stated, the Tenant who bought the application subsequently withdrew her application in any event and therefore the application is dismissed.
It is appropriate given the circumstances to suppress all details in relation to the case.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

NO ADDRESS

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5348023 about?

The tribunal order states: Given the nature of these proceedings, the Tribunal orders suppression of the

How much money was awarded in case 5348023?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5348023?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5348023?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12769340-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.