Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5379601 — Tenancy dispute at 64 Russell Road, Huntly, Huntly 3700
Decided 18 Nov 2025 · Published 18 Nov 2025 · Application 5379601
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Location
Huntly
Tribunal region
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
- [The landlord/s] is granted possession of the premises at 64 Russell Road, Huntly, Huntly 3700 immediately.
Reasons
- Both parties attended the hearing. The landlord was represented by Ms N and she appeared by way of Teams link. Ms N stated that she had full authority to represent the Trust at today’s hearing. Moke and Charlie Morgan attended by telephone.
- The landlord has applied for possession of the premises following the termination of the tenancy.
- Section 64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 provides that subject to s64(2), on application of any person entitled to possession of the premises following the termination of a tenancy, the Tribunal shall make an order granting possession of the premises to that person.
- Section 64(2) provides that no order shall be made more than 90 days after the date of termination of the tenancy.
- The tenants were given a 90 day notice of termination on 29 July 2025 which terminated the tenancy effective 26 October 2025. This was a valid notice of termination.
- The date of termination is less than 90 days ago and so the requirements of s64(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 have been met.
- Possession is therefore granted to the landlord.
- Please note that I have allowed the landlord’s application for suppression of their name, in accordance with the provisions of s95A(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, because they were wholly successful with their claim against the tenants. C ter Haar 18 November 2025