What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5391084 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is dismissed.

How much money was awarded in case 5391084?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5391084?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5391084?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13379411-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5391084 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is dismissed.

How much money was awarded in case 5391084?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5391084?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5391084?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13379411-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

67 Whytehead Crescent, Saint Heliers, Auckland, Auckland Tenancy Tribunal Case 5391084 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

The application is dismissed.

Reasons

[The party] attended the hearing to represent the tenants. Daniel Zhang attended the hearing to represent the landlord. Mr Wang was assisted by a court appointed mandarin interpreter. The hearing was held on 31 March 2026 by video.
The hearing is to consider whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider [The party]’s application for refund of bond and compensation.
The Tribunal made an order on 17 November 2025 1 where it was determined that [The party] was not a tenant, and the application was dismissed.
For this application [The party] submits that the applicant is [The tenant/s], the son of Jun Shi, who is the deceased tenant. He says that he has the authority to represent [The tenant/s]. 1 TT5345102
The tenancy agreement signed on 28 and 29 June 2024 records that there were two tenants, Kun Yan and Jun Shi. The agreement records that there were two residents, [The tenant/s] and Xu Yan.
A death certificate submitted records that Jun Shi passed away on 13 March 2025.
The tenancy began on 19 July 2024 and ended on 22 July 2025.
Kun Yan is the surviving tenant, and he can bring a claim for matters relating to the tenancy.
The personal representative of the deceased tenant (Jun Shi) can bring a claim for matters relating to the deceased tenant’s rights or obligations under the tenancy up to the date of their death.
While [The party] submits that he represents [The tenant/s] because he has been authorised by [The tenant/s]’s mother, [The tenant/s], there is no evidence of who the personal representative of Jun Shi is. This issue was considered by the Tribunal in the earlier order 2 .
[The party] does not have standing to represent Jun Shi, as there is no evidence that he is his personal representative or acting as an agent for the personal representative.
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider this application, and it is dismissed.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5391084 — Tenancy dispute at 67 Whytehead Crescent, Saint Heliers, Auckland, Auckland

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5391084 — Tenancy dispute at 67 Whytehead Crescent, Saint Heliers, Auckland, Auckland

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions