Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5437333 — Tenancy dispute
Decided 20 May 2026 · Published 20 May 2026 · Application 5437333
Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Adjudicator
V Pasupati
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- The Tribunal orders suppression of the parties’ names and identifying details.
- The application is dismissed.
Reasons
- The applicant did not attend the videoconference hearing at the scheduled time, request an adjournment, or notify the Tribunal the matter has settled. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
- The other party did not attend the hearing.
- Accordingly, the application is dismissed.