Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5464552 — Tenancy dispute
Decided 9 Jun 2026 · Published 9 Jun 2026 · Application 5464552
Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Adjudicator
T Prowse
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Tenant’s name and identifying details.
- The application is dismissed.
Reasons
- This matter was set down for hearing at 2pm today by video hearing. The landlord applicant did not attend by video or by phone. The landlord was telephoned multiple times by the Tribunal but none of the calls were answered.
- The tenant was called, she told me that she was unaware of today’s hearing, but she confirmed that she had paid the bond to the landlord directly about 2 months ago.
- As the landlord has not attended or has not provided evidence that the bond still remains unpaid, then the landlord has not proven his application and the application is dismissed.