Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5464829 — Tenancy dispute
Decided 14 Jul 2026 · Published 14 Jul 2026 · Application 5464829
Party names are redacted in the official published order. This page summarises the dispute only — not individual identities.
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Adjudicator
N Maplesden
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- The Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord and Tenant names and of the tenancy address.
- The application is dismissed.
Reasons
- The applicant did not attend the hearing and has not contacted the Tribunal. I telephoned the landlord on the mobile and landline numbers supplied but there was no response to either.
- The file shows the landlord and tenant have been emailed notice of the hearing date and time. Email and text reminders have also been sent (on 6 and 10 June 2026).
- The tenant did attend the hearing and told me a bond has now been paid and she has paid rent recently but is still in arrears. She wants to make a repayment plan with the landlord.
- I dismiss the application because there are no up to date rent records on the file and the landlord did not attend. Sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
- I suppress both parties’ names and the tenancy address from the published order.