Tenantcheck Insights

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 9063544 — Unit Titles in Auckland Central, Auckland

Decided 9 Sept 2026 · Published 9 Sept 2026 · Application 9063544

Unit Titles

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

Auckland

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

R Kee

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Tenantcheck Insights · Case study

Tenancy Tribunal case 9063544 — Unit Titles in Auckland Central, Auckland

Decided 9 Sept 2026 · Published 9 Sept 2026 · Application 9063544

Unit Titles

View official order on MoJ →Explore similar cases

At a glance

Key facts from the published tribunal order.

Location

Auckland

Tribunal region

Adjudicator

R Kee

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The application is withdrawn by leave.

Reasons

The hearing was for case conference.
Paris Bauer and Joanna Williams attended for the applicant.
Joanna Pidgeon appeared for the body corporate with Ali Karembayev, the body corporate committee chairperson.
The claim challenges the body corporate’s levying for major remedial works and seeks orders for the costs of the works to be reassessed by assessing substantial benefit to certain unit owners rather than only by utility interest.
The parties had an open discussion about the merits of the claim during the hearing. Consequently, the applicant decided to withdraw the claim.
The claim is withdrawn by leave without prejudice.
The body corporate indicated it would not seek costs.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

Unit Titles Auckland

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s0800

Key findings

Dispute theme: unit titles

Property management

WILLIAMS BAUER TRUSTEE LIMITED (applicant)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 9063544 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is withdrawn by leave.

How much money was awarded in case 9063544?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 9063544?

The primary dispute was Unit Titles.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 9063544?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/14187445-UTA_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

For landlords & property managers

Reduce avoidable tribunal risk with proper tenant checks.

Tenantcheck reports take minutes: a small step before a dispute ends up at tribunal.

Order a Tenantcheck →

No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.

Order

The application is withdrawn by leave.

Reasons

The hearing was for case conference.
Paris Bauer and Joanna Williams attended for the applicant.
Joanna Pidgeon appeared for the body corporate with Ali Karembayev, the body corporate committee chairperson.
The claim challenges the body corporate’s levying for major remedial works and seeks orders for the costs of the works to be reassessed by assessing substantial benefit to certain unit owners rather than only by utility interest.
The parties had an open discussion about the merits of the claim during the hearing. Consequently, the applicant decided to withdraw the claim.
The claim is withdrawn by leave without prejudice.
The body corporate indicated it would not seek costs.

Topics & place

Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).

Unit Titles Auckland

Residential Tenancies Act sections

s0800

Key findings

Dispute theme: unit titles

Property management

WILLIAMS BAUER TRUSTEE LIMITED (applicant)

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 9063544 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is withdrawn by leave.

How much money was awarded in case 9063544?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 9063544?

The primary dispute was Unit Titles.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 9063544?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/14187445-UTA_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

For landlords & property managers

Reduce avoidable tribunal risk with proper tenant checks.

Tenantcheck reports take minutes: a small step before a dispute ends up at tribunal.

Order a Tenantcheck →