How much money was awarded in case 4999930?

Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4999930?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4999930?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11089349-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 4999930?

Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4999930?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4999930?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11089349-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Unit/Flat Unit 102, 44 Clayburn Road, Glen Eden, Auckland Tenancy Tribunal Case 4999930 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4999930 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4999930 — net $27.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$27.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$27.00

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.

The tenancy of [The tenant/s] at Unit/Flat Unit 102, 44 Clayburn Road, Glen Eden, Auckland 0602 is terminated, and possession is granted to Home In Place (New Zealand) Limited, at 6.00pm on 9 December 2024

[The tenant/s] must pay Home In Place (New Zealand) Limited $27.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing by phone call.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Where the breach is not capable of remedy, the landlord is not expressly required to serve a 14-day breach notice on the tenant. A breach is not capable to remedy where the thing done, or its effect, cannot be undone.

However, unless the breach is serious, the Tribunal usually requires the landlord to have warned the tenant about the likely consequences of continued breach before it will exercise its discretion to terminate.

The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to notify the landlord that they will be absent from the premises for a period more than 28 days, as required by clause 6.5 of the tenancy agreement. The landlord served the tenant with a 14-day notice for the breach on 9 September 2024 in relation to allowing other people to occupy the property and subletting. The tenant denied this but advised she has not been living at the premises.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy. The premises is social housing and is required for other social housing tenants.

The tenant consents to the tenancy terminating. Filing fee

Because the landlord has wholly succeeded with the claim, I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression

As this order is made by consent and having regards to the interests of the parties and the public interest, I have made an order suppressing the tenant’s names and identifying details.

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4999930 — net $27.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$27.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$27.00

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.

[The tenant/s] must pay Home In Place (New Zealand) Limited $27.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing by phone call.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy. The premises is social housing and is required for other social housing tenants.

The tenant consents to the tenancy terminating. Filing fee

Because the landlord has wholly succeeded with the claim, I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression

As this order is made by consent and having regards to the interests of the parties and the public interest, I have made an order suppressing the tenant’s names and identifying details.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4999930 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat Unit 102, 44 Clayburn Road, Glen Eden, Auckland

At a glance

Award balance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4999930 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat Unit 102, 44 Clayburn Road, Glen Eden, Auckland

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions