What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5007534 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Junior Greaves at 96A Parrs Cross Road, Henderson, Auckland

How much money was awarded in case 5007534?

Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5007534?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5007534?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10897562-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5007534 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Junior Greaves at 96A Parrs Cross Road, Henderson, Auckland

How much money was awarded in case 5007534?

Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5007534?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5007534?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10897562-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

96A Parrs Cross Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5007534 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Reasons

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5007534 — net $27.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$27.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$27.00

The landlord attended the hearing by video. Attempts were made to join the tenant to the hearing by telephone on the two numbers provided. One call went to voicemail and the other did not answer.

The landlord has applied to the Tribunal for an order terminating the periodic tenancy on the grounds of anti-social behaviour from the tenant or someone on the premises with the tenant’s permission.

The landlord states that the anti-social behaviour is shouting, throwing items (glass and wheel rim) and loud fighting (including swearing).

Subject to certain considerations, the Tribunal must make an order terminating the tenancy if it is satisfied: a. on 3 separate occasions within a 90-day period the tenant, or a person in the premises with the tenant’s permission, engaged in anti-social behaviour in connection with the tenancy; and b. on each occasion the landlord gave the tenant written notice— i. describing clearly which specific behaviour was considered to be anti-social and (if known to the landlord) who engaged in it; and ii. advising the tenant of the date, approximate time, and location of the behaviour; and iii. stating how many other notices (if any) the landlord has given the tenant under this paragraph in connection with the same tenancy and the same 90-day period; and iv. advising the tenant of the tenant’s right to make an application to the Tribunal challenging the notice and; c. the landlord’s application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days after the landlord gave the third notice.

The Act confirms that antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes alarm, distress or nuisance that is more than minor.

I have taken into account the evidence presented by the landlord. The evidence has included two videos and several photographs of the items thrown into the neighbouring property.

I have determined that the landlord has established that anti-social behaviour has occurred on the premises by the tenant or a person on the tenancy with the tenant’s permission. The landlord has served notices on the tenant as required in the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, and the application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days of the date of the third notice.

I consider it would not be unfair to terminate the tenancy taking into account the circumstances in which the behaviour arose and the notices were given. I cannot see that the landlord has acted in any retaliatory way in bringing this application.

I cannot consider the impact on the tenant, in making an order for termination of the tenancy.

Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

Reasons

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5007534 — net $27.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$27.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$27.00

The landlord attended the hearing by video. Attempts were made to join the tenant to the hearing by telephone on the two numbers provided. One call went to voicemail and the other did not answer.

The landlord states that the anti-social behaviour is shouting, throwing items (glass and wheel rim) and loud fighting (including swearing).

The Act confirms that antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes alarm, distress or nuisance that is more than minor.

I have taken into account the evidence presented by the landlord. The evidence has included two videos and several photographs of the items thrown into the neighbouring property.

I cannot consider the impact on the tenant, in making an order for termination of the tenancy.

Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5007534 — Tenancy dispute at 96A Parrs Cross Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5007534 — Tenancy dispute at 96A Parrs Cross Road, Henderson, Auckland 0612

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Key findings

Frequently asked questions