How much money was awarded in case 5043048?

Property Damage: $820.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Credit: $311.29 awarded to tenant; Property Damage: $312.50 awarded to landlord; Doors: $402.50 awarded to landlord; Walls: $1,650.00 awarded to landlord; Replace Furnishings: Blinds: $1,322.50 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $230.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5043048?

The primary dispute was Property damage.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5043048?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11393274-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5043048?

Property Damage: $820.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Credit: $311.29 awarded to tenant; Property Damage: $312.50 awarded to landlord; Doors: $402.50 awarded to landlord; Walls: $1,650.00 awarded to landlord; Replace Furnishings: Blinds: $1,322.50 awarded to landlord; Rubbish Removal: $230.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5043048?

The primary dispute was Property damage.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5043048?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11393274-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

14A Palmers Road, Clendon Park, Auckland 2103 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5043048 — Property damage

Q: What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5043048?

The tribunal order states: Kanzas Raheke must pay Linkpeople Limited $4,090.21 immediately, calculated

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

14A Palmers Road, Clendon Park, Auckland 2103 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5043048 — Property damage | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5043048 — net $4,090.21 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Window repairs	$820.00		Window repairs
Rubbish removal	$230.00		Rubbish removal
Repairs: doors	$402.50		Repairs: doors
Repairs: walls	$1,650.00		Repairs: walls
Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation	$312.50		Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation
Replace furnishings: blinds	$1,322.50		Replace furnishings: blinds
Rent credit		$311.29	Rent credit
Bond (since refunded to landlord		$336.00	Bond (since refunded to landlord
Total award	$4,737.50	$647.29
Net award	$4,090.21
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$4,090.21

Claims and awards for application 5043048 — net $4,090.21 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Window repairs

Amount: $820.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Window repairs

Rubbish removal

Amount: $230.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Repairs: doors

Amount: $402.50
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: doors

Repairs: walls

Amount: $1,650.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: walls

Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation

Amount: $312.50
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Property damage Rubbish Removal

Order

Kanzas Raheke must pay Linkpeople Limited $4,090.21 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Reasons

Only the landlord attended the hearing.
The landlord has applied for compensation following the end of the tenancy.
The rent was in credit at the end of the tenancy. The bond has since been refunded to the landlord.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and did not remove all rubbish.
The blinds were missing at the end of the tenancy; the landlord had to replace them.
The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
The following damage was caused during the tenancy: windows, doors, walls and carpet. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
The amounts ordered are proved.
I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5043048 — net $4,090.21 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
Window repairs	$820.00		Window repairs
Rubbish removal	$230.00		Rubbish removal
Repairs: doors	$402.50		Repairs: doors
Repairs: walls	$1,650.00		Repairs: walls
Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation	$312.50		Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation
Replace furnishings: blinds	$1,322.50		Replace furnishings: blinds
Rent credit		$311.29	Rent credit
Bond (since refunded to landlord		$336.00	Bond (since refunded to landlord
Total award	$4,737.50	$647.29
Net award	$4,090.21
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$4,090.21

Claims and awards for application 5043048 — net $4,090.21 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Window repairs

Amount: $820.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Window repairs

Rubbish removal

Amount: $230.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rubbish removal

Repairs: doors

Amount: $402.50
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: doors

Repairs: walls

Amount: $1,650.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: walls

Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation

Amount: $312.50
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Repairs: carpet replacement (less depreciation

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Property damage Rubbish Removal

Order

Kanzas Raheke must pay Linkpeople Limited $4,090.21 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Reasons

Only the landlord attended the hearing.
The landlord has applied for compensation following the end of the tenancy.
The rent was in credit at the end of the tenancy. The bond has since been refunded to the landlord.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and did not remove all rubbish.
The blinds were missing at the end of the tenancy; the landlord had to replace them.
The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
The following damage was caused during the tenancy: windows, doors, walls and carpet. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
The amounts ordered are proved.
I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5043048 — Property damage at 14A Palmers Road, Clendon Park, Auckland 2103

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5043048 — Property damage at 14A Palmers Road, Clendon Park, Auckland 2103

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions