What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5110669 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5110669?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5110669?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5110669?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11516897-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5110669 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

How much money was awarded in case 5110669?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5110669?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5110669?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11516897-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

Unit/Flat 12, 26 Lees Road, Strowan, Christchurch 8052, Tenancy Tribunal Case 5110669 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Reasons

Mr Waters, representing the landlord, and [The tenant/s], the tenant, both attended the teleconference hearing.

The landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation (cost of a lock), refund bond and refund of the filing fee. During the hearing, the landlord withdrew claims for compensation and refund of the filing fee, after discussion of these issues.

The landlord has provided rent records which show rent arrears owing to 18 October 2024, which was the end of the tenancy, which is $1,492.85. The landlord confirmed they received the bond of $212.00 with the tenant’s consent, which reduces the rent arrears owing to the end of the tenancy to $1,280.85. The tenant acknowledged this is the correct amount he owes for rent arrears. Refund of the bond

As the landlord has already received the bond in full with the tenant’s consent, the Tribunal does not have to make an order refunding the bond. Therefore, the claim for refund of the bond is dismissed. Suppression

The landlord did not request name suppression. The tenant requested name suppression. Section 95A(4) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (“RTA”) provides that the Tribunal may, on the application of any party to proceedings or on its own initiative, having regard to the interests of the parties and to the public interest, order that all or part of the evidence given or the name or any identifying particulars of any witness or party not be published.

The tenant has been very cooperative with the landlord, as acknowledged by the landlord at the hearing. The tenant has communicated with the landlord’s staff about negotiating payment arrangements of rent arrears with the landlord, consented to the landlord receiving the bond, and during the hearing he agreed to what he could to progress the landlord’s claims. The tenant is living elsewhere now and is concerned about his tenancy being affected by any publication of his name. On the evidence, I find that the tenant’s interests outweigh the public interest in publishing his name. Therefore, I order that the tenant’s name and identifying details are not to be published.

Reasons

Mr Waters, representing the landlord, and [The tenant/s], the tenant, both attended the teleconference hearing.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5110669 — Rent arrears at Unit/Flat 12, 26 Lees Road, Strowan, Christchurch 8052,

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5110669 — Rent arrears at Unit/Flat 12, 26 Lees Road, Strowan, Christchurch 8052,

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions