What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5148533 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is dismissed.

How much money was awarded in case 5148533?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5148533?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5148533?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11701031-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5148533 about?

The tribunal order states: The application is dismissed.

How much money was awarded in case 5148533?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5148533?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5148533?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11701031-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

327C Karangahape Road, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5148533 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

The application is dismissed.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing which was held by teleconference.
This application concerns a property at 327 Karangahape Road, Auckland Central.
The landlord on the Tenancy Agreement is 777 Investments Limited. The tenant on the Tenancy Agreement is Accurate Infrastructure Solutions Limited.
At the beginning of the hearing Mr Bais for the tenant stated that the premises was used for accommodation for employees of Accurate Infrastructure Solutions Limited, a labour hire company.
Section 4 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 1986 (the “RTA”) is a catch-all section that states “This Act applies to every tenancy for residential purposes except as specifically provided.”
Section 5 of the RTA then lists the exceptions to section 4, that is, tenancies to which the RTA does not apply.
Section 5(g) of the RTA states: (This Act shall not apply in the following cases): “where the premises constitute any barracks or hostel conducted by an employer for the accommodation of employees of that employer or (where the employer is a company) for the accommodation of employees of any associated company (within the meaning of section 2(2)).
Both parties agreed that this exception describes the situation that existed as the basis of this Tenancy Agreement.
Section 8 of the RTA states that the parties are not precluded from agreeing in writing that all or any of the provisions of this Act shall apply in respect of the tenancy.
In this case, there is no written agreement from the parties that puts this tenancy agreement, or parts thereof, within the jurisdiction of the Tenancy Tribunal. Without this, there is no certainty as to what parts of the agreement could be included and which parts excluded from the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
For the above reasons, I determine the Tenancy Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear this dispute, and the application is dismissed.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5148533 — Tenancy dispute at 327C Karangahape Road, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5148533 — Tenancy dispute at 327C Karangahape Road, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Property management

Frequently asked questions