What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5370121 about?

The tribunal order states: [The tenant/s] and [The tenant/s] to pay 360 Property Management Limited

How much money was awarded in case 5370121?

Cleaning: $690.00 awarded to landlord; Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Lawns and Garden Work: $143.75 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $483.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $300.00 awarded to landlord; Replace Carpets: $952.04 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5370121?

The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Cleanliness.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5370121?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13026086-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5370121 about?

The tribunal order states: [The tenant/s] and [The tenant/s] to pay 360 Property Management Limited

How much money was awarded in case 5370121?

Cleaning: $690.00 awarded to landlord; Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Lawns and Garden Work: $143.75 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $483.00 awarded to landlord; Property Damage: $300.00 awarded to landlord; Replace Carpets: $952.04 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5370121?

The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Cleanliness.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5370121?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13026086-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

Unit/Flat Unit 12, 1 Tennessee Avenue, Mangere East, Tenancy Tribunal Case 5370121 — Property damage

Tenantcheck Insights

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5370121 — net $2,596.79 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Repairs to two toilet seats and a light cover Order by Consent	$483.00	Repairs to two toilet seats and a light cover Order by Consent
Cleaning costs (Order by Consent	$690.00	Cleaning costs (Order by Consent
Garden work (Order by Consent	$143.75	Garden work (Order by Consent
Replace carpets	$952.04	Replace carpets
Damage to curtains	$300.00	Damage to curtains
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,596.79
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,596.79

[The tenant/s] and [The tenant/s] to pay 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Mj Corporation Limited $2,596.79 from the bond, calculated as shown in the table below.

The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,596.79 (6529468-018) to 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Mj Corporation Limited immediately. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $123.21 (6529468-018) to [The tenant/s] and [The tenant/s] immediately.

Reasons

The hearing was conducted by telephone. Ms Francis, representative of the landlord’s agent, attended the hearing for the landlord. Ms Mehana attended the hearing and confirmed that she had authority to speak for the other tenant.

The landlord has applied for compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

The following matters were agreed by the parties during the hearing and are ordered by consent: a. Cleaning costs of $690.00 (including GST) being $862.50 (including GST) less $172.50 (including GST) for the cleaning of the carpets; b. $143.75 (including GST) to weed the garden at the end of the tenancy; and c. $483.00 for repair to two toilets seats and replacement of a light cover.

The remaining claims were for compensation for damage to the curtains and the carpet. Relevant legal considerations:

With any claim before the Tenancy Tribunal, the Tribunal applies the usual civil law standards and expectations. That means that it is for the party bringing the application to establish their claims “on the balance of probabilities”. That means that the party bringing the claim must establish that what they are claiming is more likely than not. This is referred to as the “burden of proof”. Independent witnesses, corroborating documents and photographs are an important part of discharging this burden.

As noted by the District Court in Kaipo v Clarke & McCarthy (DC) TT233/02, in practical terms this means that: ... [L]ike anyone who brings an application before a Tribunal or Court, it is incumbent upon the applicant to provide the evidence necessary to prove the case. If the applicant fails to do that, then their application will be dismissed whether it has merit or not because it is up to the applicant to provide the necessary evidence. It is not up to the other parties, and it is certainly not up to the Tribunal to extract evidence.

I do not need to be completely certain, but I need to be more certain than uncertain. In deciding any particular claim, I must consider all the evidence presented (including oral evidence during the hearing). I must weigh this evidence to decide what is more likely.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B of the RTA provides that a landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission.

Section 49B(3)(a) of the RTA provides that where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent).

Section 49B(3)(b) of the RTA provides that where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). Section 49B(3A)(a) of the RTA provides that where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage.

Section 49B(1) of the RTA provides that tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for.

Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. (See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.)

The landlord says that during the tenancy, the tenant caused damage to the carpet and the curtains.

Damage to the carpet: a. The landlord is claiming $1,234.99 (including GST) to replace the carpets. During the hearing, Ms Francis advised that the premises was a new build and the tenant was the first tenant. Ms Francis referred me to a number of photographs from the end of the tenancy showing that there were extensive stains to the carpet throughout the premises. b. During the hearing, the tenant said that she accepted responsibility for the damage to the carpet accepted the amount of the invoice. The tenant was not able to say how any of the stains occurred other than to say they were most likely caused by her young children. c. I must take into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. The Inland Revenue’s General Depreciation Guidance, IR 265, July 2025 1 provides that the useful lifespan of carpets in a residential rental property is 8 years. The tenancy lasted for a period of just over 1 year and 4.5 months. d. Having taken into account betterment and depreciation, I award $952.04 (including GST) for the damage to the carpet.

Damage to the curtains: a. The landlord claims $1,696.25 to replace 3 sets of curtains. During the hearing, Ms Francis referred me to two photographs in the exit report to support this claim: a photograph showing a stain on the back lining of one curtain and another photograph showing some damage to the lining of another curtain. The tenant accepted responsibility for the damage in these photographs. However, the tenant disputed that the tenant was responsible for damage to the curtains that warranted replacement. b. On the basis of the evidence provided to me and given that this is the landlord’s claim, and the landlord has the burden of proof, I am not satisfied that the damage caused to the curtains during the tenancy warranted full replacement of the curtains. c. It is not possible to know how much it would have cost the landlord to remedy the damage supported by the photographs Ms Francis referenced to support this claim. I award nominal damages of $300 (including GST). Filing fee:

The landlord has substantially succeeded with the claim. For this reason, I must award reimbursement of the filing fee.

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5370121 — net $2,596.79 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Repairs to two toilet seats and a light cover Order by Consent	$483.00	Repairs to two toilet seats and a light cover Order by Consent
Cleaning costs (Order by Consent	$690.00	Cleaning costs (Order by Consent
Garden work (Order by Consent	$143.75	Garden work (Order by Consent
Replace carpets	$952.04	Replace carpets
Damage to curtains	$300.00	Damage to curtains
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,596.79
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,596.79

[The tenant/s] and [The tenant/s] to pay 360 Property Management Limited As Agent For Mj Corporation Limited $2,596.79 from the bond, calculated as shown in the table below.

Reasons

The landlord has applied for compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

The remaining claims were for compensation for damage to the curtains and the carpet. Relevant legal considerations:

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

The landlord says that during the tenancy, the tenant caused damage to the carpet and the curtains.

The landlord has substantially succeeded with the claim. For this reason, I must award reimbursement of the filing fee.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5370121 — Property damage at Unit/Flat Unit 12, 1 Tennessee Avenue, Mangere East,

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5370121 — Property damage at Unit/Flat Unit 12, 1 Tennessee Avenue, Mangere East,

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions