How much money was awarded in case 5502627?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5502627?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5502627?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13648291-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

How much money was awarded in case 5502627?

Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5502627?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5502627?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13648291-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 5502627 — Tenancy dispute

Q: What was Tenancy Tribunal case 5502627 about?

The tribunal order states: An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal

Order

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5502627 — net $28.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$28.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$28.00

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.

The tenancy of Ahdeia Wineera at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 am on Friday 29 May 2026.

Ahdeia Wineera must pay [The landlord/s] $28.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Reasons

The landlord attended the remote hearing.

The tenant did not attend the hearing by Teams video link or by telephone. The Tribunal may hear matters in the absence of a party where satisfied that notice of the hearing has been given. I am satisfied that notice of the hearing was given to the tenant.

The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.

The tenant has breached their obligations by causing or permitting interference with the reasonable piece, comfort, or privacy of the landlords other tenants in the use of the premises. The tenant is also responsible for the actions of any guest at the premises.

The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 13 April 2026, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.

The notice recorded that the tenant was in breach of her obligations under S.40(2)(c) RTA In that she had caused or permitted interference with the reasonable peace comfortable privacy of other tenants. The details of the breach were excessive noise (loud music and shouting) on 10 April 2026. Verbal abuse and intimidating behaviour directed at the neighbour. Noise control call outs were made on 10 and 11 April 2026.

The tenant was required to cease all behaviour that contributed to noise, disruption, or interference with the other tenants quiet enjoyment, including conduct by any guests allowed onto the premises.

The tenant did not comply with the notice. Further complaints were received by the landlord of excessive noise on 29 April, 30 April, 1 May, 2 May, 3 May, 4 May, 5 May, 8 May, 12 May, 13 May, 21 May and 22 May 2026

A second 14-day breach notice for excessive noise was issued to the tenant on 11 May 2025.

Noise control were called to the premises on 1 May and 13 May 2026.

The complainant tenants says that they have taken to sleeping away from the premises as they are unable to sleep due to the noise late into the night and early hours of the next day.

It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because despite receiving the 14-day breach notice regarding noise, the tenant has simply continued to make excessive noise on numerous occasions.

As [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.

The landlord has applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this matter. Suppression of the landlord’s name and details is ordered.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5502627 — net $28.00 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Filing fee reimbursement	$28.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$28.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$28.00

Order

An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the Landlord’s name and identifying details.
The tenancy of Ahdeia Wineera at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 am on Friday 29 May 2026.
Ahdeia Wineera must pay [The landlord/s] $28.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Reasons

The landlord attended the remote hearing.
The tenant did not attend the hearing by Teams video link or by telephone. The Tribunal may hear matters in the absence of a party where satisfied that notice of the hearing has been given. I am satisfied that notice of the hearing was given to the tenant.
The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.
The tenant has breached their obligations by causing or permitting interference with the reasonable piece, comfort, or privacy of the landlords other tenants in the use of the premises. The tenant is also responsible for the actions of any guest at the premises.
The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 13 April 2026, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.
The notice recorded that the tenant was in breach of her obligations under S.40(2)(c) RTA In that she had caused or permitted interference with the reasonable peace comfortable privacy of other tenants. The details of the breach were excessive noise (loud music and shouting) on 10 April 2026. Verbal abuse and intimidating behaviour directed at the neighbour. Noise control call outs were made on 10 and 11 April 2026.
The tenant was required to cease all behaviour that contributed to noise, disruption, or interference with the other tenants quiet enjoyment, including conduct by any guests allowed onto the premises.
The tenant did not comply with the notice. Further complaints were received by the landlord of excessive noise on 29 April, 30 April, 1 May, 2 May, 3 May, 4 May, 5 May, 8 May, 12 May, 13 May, 21 May and 22 May 2026
A second 14-day breach notice for excessive noise was issued to the tenant on 11 May 2025.
Noise control were called to the premises on 1 May and 13 May 2026.
The complainant tenants says that they have taken to sleeping away from the premises as they are unable to sleep due to the noise late into the night and early hours of the next day.
It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because despite receiving the 14-day breach notice regarding noise, the tenant has simply continued to make excessive noise on numerous occasions.
As [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.
The landlord has applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this matter. Suppression of the landlord’s name and details is ordered.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5502627 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Award balance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5502627 — Tenancy dispute

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Should the tenancy be terminated?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions