What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4741549 about?

The tribunal order states: Karl Claud Johns must pay [The landlord/s] $2,120.44 immediately, calculated

How much money was awarded in case 4741549?

Filing Fee: $20.44 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $3,300.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4741549?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4741549?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9849086-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4741549 about?

The tribunal order states: Karl Claud Johns must pay [The landlord/s] $2,120.44 immediately, calculated

How much money was awarded in case 4741549?

Filing Fee: $20.44 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $3,300.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4741549?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4741549?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9849086-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4741549 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4741549 — net $2,120.44 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$3,300.00	Rent arrears
Filing fee reimbursement	$20.44	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$2,120.44
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$2,120.44

Order

Karl Claud Johns must pay [The landlord/s] $2,120.44 immediately, calculated as shown in table below:
The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $1,200.00 ([Bond number suppressed]) to [The landlord/s] immediately.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference. Two calls to the tenant went unanswered and to voicemail. After the first call, a brief message was left introducing myself and explaining the purpose of the call. The message concluded with the advice I would try a second time after waiting some minutes. I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing after the second call went unanswered.
The landlord had applied for termination and rent arrears but by the time of the hearing the tenancy had ended after the landlord found the premises empty on 8 January 2024. She applied an end date for the tenancy of 9 January 2024. This is accepted, noting that rent in-lieu of tenant notice was not sought.
The landlord has applied for rent arrears and has provided rent records which prove the amount owing.
For the avoidance of any doubt, the tenancy has ended and possession has returned to the landlord. If required, an order for this per s 55(1)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 would have been made. Application filing fee
Because [The applicant/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. As it has been wholly successful, suppression is ordered.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4741549 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4741549 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions