What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4758358 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Jah-vana Lilley at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated,

How much money was awarded in case 4758358?

Filing Fee: $20.44 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $5,947.14 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4758358?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4758358?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9892411-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

What was Tenancy Tribunal case 4758358 about?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Jah-vana Lilley at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated,

How much money was awarded in case 4758358?

Filing Fee: $20.44 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $5,947.14 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4758358?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4758358?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9892411-Tribunal_Order_Redacted.pdf.

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4758358 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal Case 4758358 — Rent arrears | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4758358 — net $5,967.58 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$5,947.14	Rent arrears
Filing fee reimbursement	$20.44	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$5,967.58
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$5,967.58

Claims and awards for application 4758358 — net $5,967.58 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears

Amount: $5,947.14
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $20.44
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $5,967.58

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $5,967.58

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears

Order

The tenancy of Jah-vana Lilley at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 on Friday 2 February 2024.
Jah-vana Lilley must pay [The landlord/s] $5,967.58 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Reasons

Both parties attended this video hearing.
The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy and rent arrears.
The tenant application for an adjournment received on the afternoon of the hearing is declined. The notice of hearing had been sent to the tenant’s email address as shown in her tenancy agreement as well as being notified by SMS.
Rent was at least 21 days in arrears on the date the application was filed. The tenancy is terminated. See section 55(1)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy will be $5,947.14.
As [The landlord/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.
Both parties have applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this hearing and suppression of the landlord name and details is ordered.
I have considered if I should grant a name suppression order for the tenant having regard to the interests of the parties and public interest under Section 95A(4) RTA.
I am mindful that open justice is a fundamental principle in our legal system. The issue here I need to consider is whether suppressing the tenant’s name and identifying details outweigh the interest of the open justice reporting principle.
In my view, the application for name suppression and identifying details ought to be declined for the following reasons: a. It is common for parties appearing before the Tribunal to seek suppression orders. But that is not of itself a sufficient reason to make the order. b. The disputes before me are not unusual or other than the ordinary business of the Tribunal. c. The open justice principle requires the outcome of adjudication to be available to the public; and d. Weighing up the interests of the tenant and the public interest, the public interest outweighs the tenant’s interests.
Accordingly, no order is made for suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 4758358 — net $5,967.58 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$5,947.14	Rent arrears
Filing fee reimbursement	$20.44	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$5,967.58
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$5,967.58

Claims and awards for application 4758358 — net $5,967.58 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears

Amount: $5,947.14
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $20.44
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $5,967.58

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $5,967.58

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears

Order

The tenancy of Jah-vana Lilley at [Tenancy address suppressed] is terminated, and possession is granted to [The landlord/s], at 11.59 on Friday 2 February 2024.
Jah-vana Lilley must pay [The landlord/s] $5,967.58 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Reasons

Both parties attended this video hearing.
The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy and rent arrears.
The tenant application for an adjournment received on the afternoon of the hearing is declined. The notice of hearing had been sent to the tenant’s email address as shown in her tenancy agreement as well as being notified by SMS.
Rent was at least 21 days in arrears on the date the application was filed. The tenancy is terminated. See section 55(1)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy will be $5,947.14.
As [The landlord/s] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.
Both parties have applied for name suppression. The landlord has been wholly successful in this hearing and suppression of the landlord name and details is ordered.
I have considered if I should grant a name suppression order for the tenant having regard to the interests of the parties and public interest under Section 95A(4) RTA.
I am mindful that open justice is a fundamental principle in our legal system. The issue here I need to consider is whether suppressing the tenant’s name and identifying details outweigh the interest of the open justice reporting principle.
In my view, the application for name suppression and identifying details ought to be declined for the following reasons: a. It is common for parties appearing before the Tribunal to seek suppression orders. But that is not of itself a sufficient reason to make the order. b. The disputes before me are not unusual or other than the ordinary business of the Tribunal. c. The open justice principle requires the outcome of adjudication to be available to the public; and d. Weighing up the interests of the tenant and the public interest, the public interest outweighs the tenant’s interests.
Accordingly, no order is made for suppression of the tenant’s name and identifying details.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4758358 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4758358 — Rent arrears

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Frequently asked questions